On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:22:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:39:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right way to solve this, but it is a way.
we should test the return value to check for an error there, the unfortunate thing is that since we are in a signal handler there isn't much we can do, I suggest to increment a global variable (which could for example be checked if we hit that problem by some other code in the main loop). Other ideas ?
How about this patch. It implements your suggestion.
Looks good to me. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|