[PATCH] coding-style: Document 80 chars limit for line length

The idea is to have it like a soft limit: if possible then break lines, if not then have a long line instead of some creative approach. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com&gt; --- docs/coding-style.rst | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/coding-style.rst b/docs/coding-style.rst index cfd7b16638..813128bfb6 100644 --- a/docs/coding-style.rst +++ b/docs/coding-style.rst @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ around operators and keywords: indent-libvirt() { - indent -bad -bap -bbb -bli4 -br -ce -brs -cs -i4 -l75 -lc75 \ + indent -bad -bap -bbb -bli4 -br -ce -brs -cs -i4 -l80 -lc80 \ -sbi4 -psl -saf -sai -saw -sbi4 -ss -sc -cdw -cli4 -npcs -nbc \ --no-tabs "$@" } @@ -141,6 +141,18 @@ further, by piping it through ``expand -i``, since some leading TABs can get through. Usually they're in macro definitions or strings, and should be converted anyhow. +The recommended length for lines is 80 characters, but common sense +should prevail. It may get tricky around some names (because of how +Libvirt constructs names for functions/enums/etc.) + +:: + + foo( + arg1, arg2 + ); // Bad + foo(arg1, + arg2); // Good + Libvirt requires a C99 compiler for various reasons. However, most of the code base prefers to stick to C89 syntax unless there is a compelling reason otherwise. For example, it is preferable to use -- 2.26.2