Hi All,Can someone review the patch please ?Thanks,ShivaprasadOn Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Shivaprasad bhat <shivaprasadbhat@gmail.com> wrote:ping..On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:Commit afe6e58 & c4caab53 made necessary changes to use io-helpers
during save and restore. The commit c4caab53 missed to remove the
redundant check in qemuDomainSaveImageOpen() because of which
virFileWrapperFdNew() is not called if bypass_cache is false.
Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
index 516a851..ac89372 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
@@ -6150,9 +6150,11 @@ qemuDomainSaveImageOpen(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
virDomainDefPtr def = NULL;
int oflags = open_write ? O_RDWR : O_RDONLY;
virCapsPtr caps = NULL;
+ unsigned int wrapperFlags = VIR_FILE_WRAPPER_NON_BLOCKING;
if (bypass_cache) {
int directFlag = virFileDirectFdFlag();
+ wrapperFlags |= VIR_FILE_WRAPPER_BYPASS_CACHE;
if (directFlag < 0) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED, "%s",
_("bypass cache unsupported by this system"));
@@ -6166,9 +6168,8 @@ qemuDomainSaveImageOpen(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
if ((fd = qemuOpenFile(driver, NULL, path, oflags, NULL, NULL)) < 0)
goto error;
- if (bypass_cache &&
- !(*wrapperFd = virFileWrapperFdNew(&fd, path,
- VIR_FILE_WRAPPER_BYPASS_CACHE)))
+ if (wrapperFd &&
+ !(*wrapperFd = virFileWrapperFdNew(&fd, path, wrapperFlags)))
goto error;
if (saferead(fd, &header, sizeof(header)) != sizeof(header)) {
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list