On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 19:48:15 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 06:27:08PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> By default, symlink re-creation fails if the link already exists, more
> specifically in case of meson-install-symlink.py:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/<path_to_libvirt_repo>/scripts/meson-install-symlink.py",
> line 15, in <module>
> os.symlink(target, link)
> FileExistsError: File exists: '../default.xml' -> 'default.xml'
>
> Unfortunately, Python can't mimic "ln -sf", so we have to fix this
> differently - create a temporary name which is then going to be used
> for the temporary link followed by a rename with the original link's
> name.
> Note that this solution is racy as mktemp() doesn't guarantee
> atomicity in link creation, so theoretically another process could come
> and create a file with the same name as the temporary link name, but
> a proper solution would be longer and not as elegant.
>
Well, you could do subprocess.check_output(['ln', '-sf', ...]) (yuck),
but it
does essentially the same thing anyway.
In that case, we should throw away python and stick to the shell script
Pavel had before. This python is just a vanity thing to have less shell
scripts, but doesn't really make much sense in this case.
I don't think a race here would cause anything. I would probably
remove the
file and then create the symlink and if there is something/someone else
installing the same file than it is good that we error our because there are
bigger issues than that. The whole installation process should not be
interfered with and you cannot make it atomic anyway.
Thoughts?
I agree with deleting anything pre-existing first.