在2023年2月17日二月 下午6:57,Thomas Huth写道:
On 17/02/2023 18.43, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> (Cc'ing Huacai & Jiaxun).
>
> On 17/2/23 17:38, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 2/17/23 11:47, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:36:41AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>> I feel the discussion petered out without a conclusion.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think letting the status quo win by inertia is a good
outcome
>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>> Which 32-bit hosts are still useful, and why?
>>>
>>> Which 32-bit hosts does Linux still provide KVM support for.
>>
>> All except ARM: MIPS, x86, PPC and RISC-V.
>>
>> I would like to remove x86, but encountered some objections.
>>
>> MIPS, nobody is really using it I think.
>
> 32-bit was added in 2014, commit 222e7d11e7 ("target-mips: Enable KVM
> support in build system"). I'm not aware of anybody using it (even
> testing it). I don't have hardware to test it (neither time).
Could you maybe suggest a kernel patch to remove it, to see what happens?
... if nobody objects to the removal of the 32-bit MIPS KVM kernel support
and the patch gets merged, that would help us in the long run, I think.
I’m still occasionally testing 32-bit MIPS KVM support with MIPS P5600.
It works just fine so there is no need for further maintenance work.
I’d be sad to see the support go but I can live with it.
There are commercial users for MIPS 32 KVM but they’re all running customized downstream
QEMU so I guess it’s fine.
Thanks
- Jiaxun
Thanks,
Thomas
--
- Jiaxun