On 10/07/2016 09:31 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:12 +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> Daniel, Andrea,
> have you looked into the change in behaviour caused by patch 4 of this
> series? When libvirtd is stopped I get all my running domains suspended.
> Restarting libvirtd now also causes a disruption since all domains are
> suspended and than resumed.
> Before the commit of this patch the domains used to remain running
> without these disruptions and as a user this is what I expect to happen.
> I propose to revert commit fb2025ede9ecde1aa04ba6e01ce0c82c9e42dc66.
Oh, you're right! Thank you for reporting this issue.
We don't want to revert the change though, merely to
downgrade the Requires to a Wants.
That way, libvirtd stopping (or restarting) will not
cause libvirt-guests to stop, but when starting
libvirt-guests an attempt will still be made to start
up libvirtd if it's not running already.
I'll have patches on the list shortly.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
The directive Wants works for me. Just tried it out.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards
Boris Fiuczynski
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Köderitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294