On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:05:17PM +0800, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
在 2018/6/2 下午10:18, Ján Tomko 写道:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Xiao Feng Ren wrote:
>> From: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin(a)linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> The pci-root depends on zpci capability. So autogenerate pci-root if
>> zpci exists.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin(a)linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Zimmermann <stzi(a)linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
>> index ee676a2789..05136540aa 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
>> @@ -3068,6 +3068,7 @@ qemuDomainDefAddDefaultDevices(virDomainDefPtr
>> def,
>> case VIR_ARCH_S390X:
>> addDefaultUSB = false;
>> addPanicDevice = true;
>> + addPCIRoot = virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_ZPCI);
>
> So from a certain QEMU version all the S390 machine types have an
> implicit PCI root?
If zPCI exists, there must be pci root.
>
> Is migration a thing on S390?
I'm not clear with your said. Could you please explain more?
>
Well from this code it seems from a certain version, QEMU added a new
implicit device for all machine types, without letting libvirt have
control over it, which is strange.
So if we have a machine started by older libvirt on older QEMU,
can we do a live migration to a newer libvirt+QEMU with the zPCI
functionality? Or did live migration never work on S390?
Jano