On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:19:04AM -0500, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:51:48PM +0400, marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com>
> >
> > I am working on a WIP series to add QEMU Spice/virgl rendernode option.
> > Since rendernodes are not stable across reboots, I propose that QEMU
> > accepts also a PCI address (other bus types may be added in the future).
>
> Hmm, can you elaborate on this aspect ? It feels like a parallel
> to saying NIC device names are not stable, so we should configure
> guests using PCI addresses instead of 'eth0', etc but we stuck with
> using NIC names in libvirt on the basis that you can create udev
> rules to ensure stable naming ?
>
> So is there not a case to be made that if you want stable render
> device names when multiple NICs are present, then you should use
> udev to ensure a given device always maps to the same PCI dev.
I thought it was simpler to use a PCI address (do you expect users
to create udev rules for the GPUs?)
Well most users will only have 1 GPU so surely this won't be a problem
in the common case. Is it possible to get some stable naming rules into
udev upstream though, so all distros get stable names by default
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|