Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/7] qemu: Fix misleading comment for qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver()

On 10/09/2012 07:39 AM, Peter Krempa wrote: > The comment stated that you may call qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver() > without passing qemud_driver to signalize it's not locked. signalize is a valid spelling, but unusual; I'd write it 'signal'. > qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver still accesses the qemud_driver > structure and the lock singalling is done through a separate parameter. s/singalling/signaling/ > --- > src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > ACK. This one can be applied independently of my pending patches (aargh, I still need to get those rebased with comments addressed...).