On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 02:30:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:19:28 -0500, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Note that with the introduction of SPDX, Fedora no longer wants maintainers to do effective license analysis, hence we no list
*we now list
all the licenses that are applicable to the binary package contents
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_lice...
In examples in this page ...
Note, we can still omit licenses that are only applicable to the build system.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> --- libvirt.spec.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in index 77b274b6f9..afd0b04f99 100644 --- a/libvirt.spec.in +++ b/libvirt.spec.in @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ Summary: Library providing a simple virtualization API Name: libvirt Version: @VERSION@ Release: 1%{?dist} -License: LGPLv2+ +License: GPL-2.0-or-later and LGPL-2.1-only and LGPL-2.1-or-later and OFL-1.1
... the logical operators are spelled all-caps.
Yes, that's actually normal practice, so I'll change this.
URL: https://libvirt.org/
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|