On 02/15/2017 06:35 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig(a)suse.com
<mailto:jfehlig@suse.com>> wrote:
Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to
recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks
prefer I can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit.
I think you have me to blame for "tunnelled". At the time I initially wrote
tunnelled migration support, I did a Google search similar to what you have
done, and determined that tunnelled seemed to be slightly preferred.
Subsequently almost everyone has balked at it, but I think the horse has left
the barn on it and we should probably stick with "tunnelled".
Ok. I also failed to realize that the commit providing the news item used
'tunnelled'. I've sent a patch to revert the spelling change, but I'll
wait for
an explicit ACK this time
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-February/msg00770.html
Regards,
Jim