On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:15:14AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
According to
https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726
the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Thus mark it as deprecated
in QEMU, so we can remove it in a future release if the project does
not gain momentum again.
Acked-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com>
---
v2: Mark it as deprecated in the QAPI and print a warning once, too
docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++
qapi/block-core.json | 7 ++++++-
block/gluster.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index ed31d4b0b2..b231aa3948 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -395,6 +395,15 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on the command line
using the
used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that provides
a password via a file, or encrypted.
+``gluster`` backend (since 9.2)
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+According to
https://marc.info/?l=fedora-devel-list&m=171934833215726
+the GlusterFS development effectively ended. Unless the development
+gains momentum again, the QEMU project might remove the gluster backend
+in a future release.
I'd suggest the second half of the sentance can be simplified:
", the QEMU project will remove the gluster backend/"
since marking something as deprecated is a stronger than "might".
We /will/ remove it, unless new informaton comes to light that
makes us re-evaluate the plans.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|