On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:10:34PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
Ignore @source in the case of the test driver and return fixed
private
IPv4 addresses for all the interfaces defined in the domain.
Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass(a)gmail.com>
---
The default config of the test driver has no guest interfaces defined,
so this must be tested with a custom config.
Maybe it would be a good idea to add one or more guest interfaces in the
default config. I could send an additional patch for this.
I agree and at the same time I think that patch and this one should be part of
the same series.
src/test/test_driver.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
index a4c17ef0df..3a81f51a88 100644
--- a/src/test/test_driver.c
+++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
@@ -3220,6 +3220,76 @@ static int testDomainBlockStats(virDomainPtr domain,
return ret;
}
+static int
+testDomainInterfaceAddresses(virDomainPtr dom,
+ virDomainInterfacePtr **ifaces,
+ unsigned int source ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ unsigned int flags)
+{
+ size_t i;
+ size_t ifaces_count = 0;
+ int ret = -1;
+ char ipaddr[32];
+ char macaddr[VIR_MAC_STRING_BUFLEN];
+ virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
+ virDomainInterfacePtr iface = NULL;
+ virDomainInterfacePtr *ifaces_ret = NULL;
+
+ virCheckFlags(0, -1);
+
+ if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (virDomainObjCheckActive(vm) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (VIR_ALLOC_N(ifaces_ret, vm->def->nnets) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < vm->def->nnets; i++) {
+ if (VIR_ALLOC(iface) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (VIR_STRDUP(iface->name, vm->def->nets[i]->ifname) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ virMacAddrFormat(&(vm->def->nets[i]->mac), macaddr);
+ if (VIR_STRDUP(iface->hwaddr, macaddr) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (VIR_ALLOC(iface->addrs) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ iface->addrs[0].type = VIR_IP_ADDR_TYPE_IPV4;
+ iface->addrs[0].prefix = 24;
+
+ sprintf(ipaddr, "192.168.0.%ld", 100 + (i % 155));
It's test driver do we expect to be dealing with that many interfaces? I think
'100 + i' or even 'i + i' would be just fine, we don't need to
overcomplicate
it.
+ if (VIR_STRDUP(iface->addrs[0].addr, ipaddr) < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
How about using virAsprintf directly into iface->addrs[0].addr? (sprintf is also
blacklisted by the syntax-check)
+
+ iface->naddrs = 1;
+
+ VIR_STEAL_PTR(ifaces_ret[i], iface);
We usually use VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT for ^this, it also takes the ifaces_count
counter which it increments for you, but since you already pre-allocated the
list earlier, you'd be interested in the _INPLACE version of the same macro.
Erik
+ ifaces_count++;
+ }
+
+ VIR_STEAL_PTR(*ifaces, ifaces_ret);
+ ret = ifaces_count;
+
+ cleanup:
+ virDomainObjEndAPI(&vm);
+
+ if (ifaces_ret) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ifaces_count; i++)
+ virDomainInterfaceFree(ifaces_ret[i]);
+ }
+ virDomainInterfaceFree(iface);
+
+ VIR_FREE(ifaces_ret);
+
+ return ret;
+}