Re: [PATCH 1/2] virnuma: Assume numa_bitmask_isbitset() exists
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:45:11PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
This function was introduced in the 2.0.6 release which happened
in December 2010. I think it is safe to assume that all libnuma
we deal with have the function.
Yeah, there's a fair bit of historical baggage we could clean up. I
mean we're still asking for
# define NUMA_VERSION1_COMPATIBILITY 1
which is probably not relevant since RHEL6
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
meson.build | 5 +----
src/util/virnuma.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|