7 Jan
2011
7 Jan
'11
10:10 a.m.
On 07/01/2011, at 6:12 PM, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote: <snip>
Guaranteed sounds best to me.
Thats not Gauranteed to the best of my knowlegde
Balbir suggest "enforced", I guessed i dropped it somewhere. https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-August/msg00712.html
Balbir's suggested wording (from the email): "limit to enforce on memory contention" Does that mean it's the minimum memory "limit" it would really like to have, but can't guarantee it? (ie it's not guaranteed)