2013/5/2 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>:
On 05/01/2013 12:44 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
--- src/esx/esx_vi_generator.py | 430 ++++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-)
My python is weak, so I reviewed this by comparing the generated files before and after this patch; added comments in the generated code are nice, but there are also some added frees. Are these additions intentional to fix a leak, or are they representing a bug in your patch? If intentional, then this is 1.0.5 material if you improve the commit message and push in time; if accidental and no real bug is being fixed, then a v2 should wait until after the release.
The changes in the generated files you're seeing here are intended, but they are coming from another patch that I pushed yesterday: http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=4e650435edeb2870c907721ea8b... This refactoring patch should not change the output at all. And it didn't in my test. -- Matthias Bolte http://photron.blogspot.com