Yes, I talked to him and he said he will review and test. Thanks
On 07/09/2018 05:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 05:14:35PM +0300, Ivan Mishonov wrote:
> ---
> src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c | 2 +-
> src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c b/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
> index 802997bd2d..e595b3d6c1 100644
> --- a/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
> +++ b/src/bhyve/bhyve_command.c
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int
> bhyveBuildLPCArgStr(const virDomainDef *def ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> virCommandPtr cmd)
> {
> - virCommandAddArgList(cmd, "-s", "1,lpc", NULL);
> + virCommandAddArgList(cmd, "-s", "31,lpc", NULL);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c b/src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c
> index 03aa6c93bd..2ed3013552 100644
> --- a/src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c
> +++ b/src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c
> @@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ bhyveCollectPCIAddress(virDomainDefPtr def ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> if (addr->domain == 0 && addr->bus == 0) {
> if (addr->slot == 0) {
> return 0;
> - } else if (addr->slot == 1) {
> + } else if (addr->slot == 31) {
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> - _("PCI bus 0 slot 1 is reserved for the implicit
"
> + _("PCI bus 0 slot 31 is reserved for the implicit
"
> "LPC PCI-ISA bridge"));
> return -1;
> }
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
but i won't push this, as Roman should double check in case there was an
important reason he chose slot 1 originally.
Regards,
Daniel