On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:01 PM Jason Dillaman
<jdillama(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:50 AM Han Han <hhan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Diff from v3:
> > - add the check for capability of rbd namespace
> > - rename the item of rbd namespace in disk source struct
> > - combine the commit of doc into the commit of patch
> > - remove the code for -drive
> >
> > gitlab branch:
> >
https://gitlab.com/hhan2/libvirt/-/commits/rbd-namespace-v4
> >
> > Han Han (4):
> > qemu_capabilities: Add QEMU_CAPS_RBD_NAMESPACE
> > conf: Support to parse rbd namespace attribute
> > qemu: Implement rbd namespace attribute
> > news: qemu: Support rbd namespace
> >
> > NEWS.rst | 6 +++
> > docs/formatdomain.rst | 5 ++-
> > docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 3 ++
> > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 4 ++
> > src/qemu/qemu_block.c | 1 +
> > src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 4 ++
> > src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 3 ++
> > src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 8 ++++
> > src/util/virstoragefile.h | 1 +
> > .../caps_5.0.0.aarch64.xml | 1 +
> > .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.0.0.ppc64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_5.0.0.riscv64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_5.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > .../caps_5.1.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> > ...k-network-rbd-namespace.x86_64-latest.args | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
> > .../disk-network-rbd-namespace.xml | 33 +++++++++++++++
> > tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 1 +
> > ...sk-network-rbd-namespace.x86_64-latest.xml | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 1 +
> > 19 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644
> tests/qemuxml2argvdata/disk-network-rbd-namespace.x86_64-latest.args
> > create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/disk-network-rbd-namespace.xml
> > create mode 100644
> tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/disk-network-rbd-namespace.x86_64-latest.xml
> >
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
>
> Hopefully you still plan to add a "pool" attribute in a future series
> to help split-up the overloaded "pool/image" name attribute.
>
>From my opinions, I think it's ok to keep "pool/image" in the name
attribute if the meaning of this attribute
is clarified in libvirt docs.
Currently I have no plan to split the "pool/image".
That would create back compat issues too, so I can't see us splitting
that.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: