1 Jun
2011
1 Jun
'11
7:32 a.m.
2011/5/31 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>:
On 05/30/2011 12:33 PM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
We commonly use "value, length" order, let's stick to this. --- daemon/remote.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- src/remote/remote_driver.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
ACK. (Does it show that I built up the factored function incrementally, without realizing that the end result ended up going against convention?)
You might also just have matched the XDR on-the-wire ordering of arrays :) Thanks, pushed. Matthias