On 08/03/2016 09:40 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 07/28/2016 08:02 AM, Jovanka Gulicoska wrote:
> Add node device event handling infrastructure to node_device_event.[ch]
> ---
> src/Makefile.am | 5 +
> src/conf/node_device_event.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/conf/node_device_event.h | 59 +++++++++++
> src/libvirt_private.syms | 5 +
> 4 files changed, 303 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 src/conf/node_device_event.c
> create mode 100644 src/conf/node_device_event.h
>
[...]
> diff --git a/src/conf/node_device_event.c b/src/conf/node_device_event.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..61bc912
[...]
> +
> +/**
> + * virNodeDeviceEventLifecycleNew:
> + * @name: name of the node device object the event describes
> + * @type: type of lifecycle event
> + * @detail: more details about @type
> + *
> + * Create a new node device lifecycle event.
> + */
> +virObjectEventPtr
> +virNodeDeviceEventLifecycleNew(const char *name,
> + int type,
> + int detail)
> +{
> + virNodeDeviceEventLifecyclePtr event;
> +
> + if (virNodeDeviceEventsInitialize() < 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (!(event = virObjectEventNew(virNodeDeviceEventLifecycleClass,
> + virNodeDeviceEventDispatchDefaultFunc,
> + VIR_NODE_DEVICE_EVENT_ID_LIFECYCLE,
> + 0, name, NULL, name)))
^^^^
This has caused a Coverity build failure since the prototype has:
ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(6)
I think just dropping it is fine? The code was updated to handle uuid=NULL
diff --git a/src/conf/object_event_private.h b/src/conf/object_event_private.h
index 92c25d4..27b461f 100644
--- a/src/conf/object_event_private.h
+++ b/src/conf/object_event_private.h
@@ -106,6 +106,6 @@ virObjectEventNew(virClassPtr klass,
const unsigned char *uuid,
const char *key)
ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(2) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(5)
- ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(6) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(7);
+ ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(7);
#endif
It gets even worse in the function and needs to be resolved before
the
"next" release.
I can't parse this sentence... are there additional issues?
Thanks,
Cole