26.01.2016 16:33, Martin Kletzander пишет:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:14:23PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 13:26:32 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 25.01.2016 10:16, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
> ...
[snip]
>> What if, instead of introducing bunch of Locked() functions
we
>> introduce
>> a new internal API to virDomainObjList that will look like this:
>>
>> int virDomainObjListRename(virDomainObjListPtr domains,
>> virDomainObjPtr dom,
>> const char *new_name,
>> int (*driverRename)(virDomainObjPtr, ...),
>> int (*rollBack)(virDomainObjPtr, ...));
>>
>> This function will encapsulate the renaming and at the correct spot it
>> will call driverRename() so that driver can adjust its internal state.
>> If the driver is successful, just remove the old entry. If it is not,
>> call rollBack() callback which will cancel partially performed
>> operation
>> and restore original state of the driver.
>> Moreover, in the virDomainObjListRename() we can ensure the locking
>> order and we don't need to introduce new BeginJob() API with no
>> timeout.
>
> But very much this approach I like :-)
>
That's what I meant with:
"Or the other way would be moving parts of the rename code into this
file
to make it available for other drivers as well."
but you explained it in more detail and understandably. ACK for that
idea as well.
I like it too. I can rework the patch following this way if no one wants
to volunteer.
> Jirka
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list