21 Jan
2013
21 Jan
'13
1:11 p.m.
On 01/21/2013 02:10 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 01/21/13 12:31, Martin Kletzander wrote:
[...]
Because this and [PATCH 5/5] both require [PATCH 3/5] to be in, I'm cond-ACKing this patch with the same condition as [PATCH 3/5].
I assume that you mean patch 2/5 :)
Sorry, of course I meant [2/5] instead of [3/5]
Martin