Hi All,
I received a private bug report that starting a VM with swtpm device fails with
qemu-system-aarch64. The VM config has
<tpm model='tpm-tis'>
<backend type='emulator' version='2.0'/>
</tpm>
QEMU reports the following error
error: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor:
2021-02-07T05:15:35.378927Z qemu-system-aarch64: -device
tpm-tis,tpmdev=tpm-tpm0,id=tpm0: 'tpm-tis' is not a valid device model name
Indeed it appears the device name is 'tpm-tis-device' [1][2] for ARM virt. The
similar yet different device naming between x86 and ARM is unfortunate. IIUC,
the devices are the same between the architectures, i.e. they both emulate a TPM
device conforming to the TIS spec. If so, adding a 'tpm-tis-device' to
virDomainTPMModel seems redundant. I assume the naming difference should be
handled internally, e.g. something like the below patch to qemuBuildTPMDevStr? I
can send a proper patch if this is an acceptable approach.
Regards,
Jim
[1]
https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/specs/tpm.html
[2]
https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/c294ac327ca99342b90bd3a83d2cef9b447afaa7
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
index 92036d26c0..5154611ccd 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
@@ -9198,6 +9198,9 @@ qemuBuildTPMDevStr(const virDomainDef *def,
g_auto(virBuffer) buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER;
const char *model = virDomainTPMModelTypeToString(tpm->model);
+ if (tpm->model == VIR_DOMAIN_TPM_MODEL_TIS && def->os.arch ==
VIR_ARCH_AARCH64)
+ model = "tpm-tis-device";
+
virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "%s,tpmdev=tpm-%s,id=%s",
model, tpm->info.alias, tpm->info.alias);
This looks fairly reasonable. Please make sure you also include a
test case for this usage.
If you're feeling fancy, you might consider augmenting
qemuValidateDomainDeviceDefTPM() to ensure VIR_DOMAIN_TPM_MODEL_TIS
is only used on x86 or with the aarch64 virt machine type.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization