Re: [libvirt] Question about PHP licencing for libvirt-php (php-libvirt for Fedora)

On 03/11/2011 04:15 AM, Lyre wrote: > On 03/10/2011 07:12 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: >> Well, I agree that LGPLv2+ license would be better. We need to wait >> for Lyre's and Radek's reply then. > > I agree with Radek: > > > I prefer to use license that will allow widespread use of the > project and ensure that if someone needs some additional function > he/she will add them and share with others. > > Since I don't understand those license well, I also don't mind if you > guys change it to the suitable one. > So, is it OK to do what Daniel wrote about ? I mean this: > So we avoid the PHP license for our code then. Here's what we do > > - Our code is licensed LGPLv2+ > - Project is named/described 'libvirt bindings for PHP' > - RPM / tar.gz is named php-libvirt (this is in fact required by Fedora > RPM guidelines for php extensions) > Is that OK with you Radek and Lyre or any other idea about the licence?

Thanks, Michal -- Michal Novotny<minovotn(a)redhat.com>, RHCE Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat