On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 02:36:02PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote:
This series is a merge of
1) "Support hypervisor-threads-pin in vcpupin"
(
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-July/msg01361.html)
2) "support to set cpu bandwidth for hypervisor threads"
(
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-June/msg01161.html)
to make life easier because of the two share some patches.
This series is really focusing on pinning threads associated
with the <emulator> element, rather than the hypervisor. The
hypervisor is a separate entity that is shared.
So I'm thinking that this entire patch series could replace
'hypervisor' with 'emulator' everywhere. Any one has agree
or disagree ?
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|