Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/45] Machine queue, 2018-10-18

On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 17:23:21 -0300 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:53:45PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:44:08 -0300 > > Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:12:31PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > On 18 October 2018 at 21:03, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > The following changes since commit 09558375a634e17cea6cfbfec883ac2376d2dc7f: > > > > > > > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/pmaydell/tags/pull-target-arm-20181016-1' into staging (2018-10-16 17:42:56 +0100) > > > > > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > > > > > git://github.com/ehabkost/qemu.git tags/machine-next-pull-request > > > > > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6d8e1bcc7dd5e819ce81e6a87fffe23e39c700cc: > > > > > > > > > > numa: Clean up error reporting in parse_numa() (2018-10-17 16:33:40 -0300) > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Machine queue, 2018-10-18 > > > > > > > > > > * sysbus init/realize cleanups > > > > > (Cédric Le Goater, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé) > > > > > * memory-device refactoring (David Hildenbrand) > > > > > * -smp: deprecate incorrect CPUs topology (Igor Mammedov) > > > > > * -numa parsing cleanups (Markus Armbruster) > > > > > * Fix hostmem-file memory leak (Zhang Yi) > > > > > * Typo fix (Li Qiang) > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi. This had some problems in merge testing, I'm afraid: > > > > > > > > On aarch64 host, warnings running tests/cpu-plug-test for i386 and s390 targets: > > > > > > > > TEST: tests/cpu-plug-test... (pid=12602) > > > > /i386/cpu-plug/pc-i440fx-3.0/cpu-add/1x3x2&maxcpus=12: > > > > qemu-system-i386: warning: Invalid CPU topology deprecated: sockets > > > > (1) * cores (3) * threads (2) != maxcpus (12) > > > [...] > > > > > > > > (plus similar ppc64, x86_64 targets) > > > > > > Ouch. Apologies. > > > > > > Can we please do something make sure "make check" will fail on > > > these cases? I'd like to be able to trust CI systems like > > > travis-ci. > > > > > > > we probably don't want make check fail on warning. > > I disagree. If a warning is blocking a pull request from being > merged, it must make CI systems fail too. Otherwise we're > defeating the purpose of CI systems. When we deprecate options we are bound to trigger warning which are not errors and are meant to be there until deprecated options are removed/tested by make check. So what would you suggest to do wrt tests that use deprecated features, drop testing for it?