On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 05:31:09PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:24 PM Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 10:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 05:03:24PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > > /usr/local/bin/rst2html5 --stylesheet= --strict docs/manpages/virsh.rst
> > > > docs/manpages/virsh.rst:41: (ERROR/3) Error in "code-block" directive:
> > > > 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> > > >
> > > > .. code-block::
> > > >
> > > >    virsh [OPTION]... <command> <domain> [ARG]...
> > >
> > > This is a sign of having a bad version of "rst2html5" installed.
> > >
> > > We expect to be using  rst2html5 that comes with python docutils
> > > package.
> >
> > Yeah, the python3-docutils Debian package will contain a working
> > rst2html5 binary.
> >
> >
> That's strange, my rst2html5 comes from docutils:
> python3-docutils: /usr/share/docutils/scripts/python3/rst2html5
>
> and
> /usr/local/bin/rst2html5 --version
> rst2html5 (Docutils 0.16 [release], Python 3.8.2, on linux)

I wouldn't expect this to have been in /usr/local/bin - that is usually
a sign of a local adminstrator install, via "pip" or some other means.
The distro provided version would be in /usr/bin