On 28.04.2012 10:22, Osier Yang wrote:
> It doesn't break out the "for" loop even if duplicate pool is
> found, and thus the "matchpool" could be overriden as NULL again
> if there is different pool afterwards.
>
> To address the problem in libvirt-user list:
>
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-April/msg00150.html
> ---
> src/conf/storage_conf.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
ACK
Michal