
30 Apr
2012
30 Apr
'12
9:11 a.m.
On 2012年04月28日 17:06, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 28.04.2012 10:22, Osier Yang wrote:
It doesn't break out the "for" loop even if duplicate pool is found, and thus the "matchpool" could be overriden as NULL again if there is different pool afterwards.
To address the problem in libvirt-user list:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-April/msg00150.html --- src/conf/storage_conf.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
ACK
Michal
Thanks, pushed. Osier