Re: [libvirt PATCH v8 0/3] Ignore EPERM on implicit clearing of VF VLAN ID

On 2/2/22 1:04 PM, Michal Prívozník wrote: I somehow thought this had already been pushed, so I was surprised when it showed up again :-/ I think the only issue I had before was that I thought the new unit tests were more testing the test setup than the actual code, but Dan convinced me otherwise. So I'm fine with this change. A newly discovered (but pre-existing, so non-consequential to these patches) problem associated with vlans is that we don't differentiate between "set vlan 0" and "don't set any vlan", which I hadn't even considered before, until this BZ came up: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2035726 (The reporter is trying to use <tag id='-1'/> to "unset" the vlan tag for an interface)