On 5/13/20 12:49 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 5/13/20 12:45 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
[...]
>
> I think users need to understand that a pSeries guest will not
> benefit from this but only a pSeries guest that is a secure virtual
> machine that needs special hardware to run and where there is an
> Ultravisor. Everyone would want more security for their pSeries
> guest, especially if it comes for free. Unfortunately this is not the
> case and one needs new hardware...
>
True. I propose this wording:
<span class="since">Since 6.4.0</span>, a new model
called
<code>spapr-tpm-proxy</code> was added for pSeries guests.
This model
only works with the 'passthrough' backend. It creates a TPM
Proxy
device that communicates with an existing TPM Resource
Manager in the host,
for example /dev/tpmrm0, to enable secure virtual machine
support for the
guest with the help of an Ultravisor. Adding a TPM Proxy to
a pSeries guest
brings no security benefits unless the guest is running in a
PPC64 host that
in -> on
has Ultravisor support and access to a TPM Resource Manager.
Only one TPM
Proxy device is allowed per guest, but a TPM Proxy device
can be added together
with other TPM devices.
If you agree, I'll use a similar text in the news.xml changes (patch
8/8) as well.
I would agree to this.
Thanks,
DHB
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> DHB
>
>