On 12/18/19 5:34 AM, Fabiano FidĂȘncio wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:19 AM Marc Hartmayer
<mhartmay(a)linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 05:41 PM +0100, Fabiano FidĂȘncio <fidencio(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano FidĂȘncio <fidencio(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> src/util/virutil.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/util/virutil.c b/src/util/virutil.c
>> index ed1f696e37..8c255abd7f 100644
>> --- a/src/util/virutil.c
>> +++ b/src/util/virutil.c
>> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ virGetHostnameQuiet(void)
>> char *
>> virGetUserDirectory(void)
>> {
>> - return virGetUserDirectoryByUID(geteuid());
>> + return g_strdup_printf("%s/libvirt", g_get_home_dir());
>
>
> I would suggest to use 'g_build_path' instead of 'g_strdup_printf'.
> E.g.
>
> g_build_path(G_DIR_SEPARATOR_S, g_get_home_dir(), "libvirt");
Good catch
There's also g_build_filename which sounds simpler. Any reason for one
over the other?
- Cole