On 09/15/2010 10:45 AM, Osier wrote:
<snip>
I guess it's a typo, should be
"addr->inet6.sin6_addr.s6_addr[i]", but not
"addr->inet6.sin6_addr.s6_addr16[i]".. :-)
Thanks Osier. Pretty sure it's not a typo, *but* it lets the code
compile that part of things and keep on going, so I can look for other
breakage. (hopefully not caused by this "probably dodgy" workaround)
:)