On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 10:31:33AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Libvirt Security Notice: LSN-2016-0001
======================================
Summary: Authentication disabled when setting empty VNC
password
Reported on: 20130531
Published on: 20130531
Fixed on: 20160630
Reported by: Vivian Zhang <vivianzhang(a)redhat.com>
Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo(a)scientia.net>
Patched by: Jiri Denemar <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
See also: CVE-2016-5008
Branch: v1.3.1-maint
Broken in: v1.3.3.1
Broken by: 9d73efdbe3ea61a13a11fdc24a2cb530eaa0b66f
Fixed by: 2d5370eba6b52f44cf832eba28f162c55331a47c
Branch: v1.3.3-maint
Broken in: v1.3.3.1
Broken by: 9d73efdbe3ea61a13a11fdc24a2cb530eaa0b66f
Fixed by: 881441f84a30cd3921df313a982f7162d7ca04f4
I just want to make sure my guess is right. We don't have 1.3.2-maint
branch, so it wasn't back-ported there. Does that mean we will never
need such branch, hence we're fine; or does it mean that we should add a
branch for the CVE fix just in case someone wants to back-port other fix
to 1.3.2 and creates it -- so that it is not vulnerable?
My guess is that we won't have 1.3.2 but we should rather be safe...
Martin