Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:06:21PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>>>> The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our
>>>>> libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> ... because we first have to determine how to expose the
device's existence
>>>>> in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
>>> So it's isa-pvpanic meaning
"I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic"
>>
>> More like "we tested pvpanic for more than 2 weeks and did not find
>> anything that's utterly broken in the design".
>>
>> And more practically "you are sure there are no traces of builtin
>> pvpanic; also, panicked state is reversible".
>
> isa-pvpanic does not look like a sane way to say that.
>
> NACK
You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
it can be me), don't you?
Paolo
No I don't.
--
MST