23 Feb
2007
23 Feb
'07
9:29 p.m.
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:26 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:16:00PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Add a Red Hat style init script, using the service name libvirt_qemud.
I'm wondering about the future where we have Rich's libvirtd to start up too. Perhaps we should call the init script just 'libvirtd' and in the future it can either start both libvirt_qemud & libvirtd or if we merge the two, just start libvirtd. That way we won't have to worry about possible renaming of the init script during an update.
Sounds good to me, how about just re-naming the daemon to libvirtd too ? Cheers, Mark.