On 01/13/2011 06:04 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
index 3d10b42..0fb6ec9 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
@@ -1087,48 +1087,44 @@ fail:
return -1;
}
+
+static char *
+qemuCapsExtractDeviceProps(const char *qemu,
+ const char *device)
+{
+ virCommandPtr cmd = virCommandNew(qemu);
+ char *output = NULL;
+
+ virCommandAddArg(cmd, "-device");
+ virCommandAddArgFormat(cmd, "%s,?", device);
Phooey - I have a patch in my smartcard series that conflicts with this.
But I like mine better - I added testsuite coverage of device parsing,
and have only 1 qemu run for all devices rather than 1 run per device.
I guess I'd better clean it up and post right away, to compare our two
approaches.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org