On 03/08/2010 10:21 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 05:56:01PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:41:09AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> According to David Allan on 3/5/2010 10:25 AM:
>>> I added a section on good and bad uses of goto to the hacking document and
website.
>>>
>>> Also, should we dispense with the HACKING file's content altogether and
replace it with a link to hacking.html on the website?
>>
>> Is there a make rule to generate one from the other?
>
> I think the HTML version is more important. Either we can kill HACKING
> or do a HTML->Text conversion for it
I think keeping a text version for that one is at least in spirit a
good idea, just generate it from HTML.
I suggest to commit the change to the hacking.html.in but not change
the text file yet, I will try to come up with the tiny XSLT needed to
generate it hopefully this week.
Ok, thanks Daniel. I've pushed just the hacking.html.in
Dave