On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 10:00 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>
> I guess we could skip all the details and just give the user
>
> <vcpus max='255' suggested='96'/>
>
> so they don't have to implement the logic themselves. But
> reporting the KVM limits without taking QEMU limits into
> consideration is not the way to go, I think.
Yes. I didn't want to say we should only report the number from KVM, I
meant we should only show the number that is applicable to a KVM domain
of the particular machine type. That is, both KVM and QEMU limits
combined into a single number which gives the real limit.
Okay :)
But if we don't change 'virsh maxvcpus --type kvm' to report
the computed limit, instead of just the KVM limit as it does
now, the problem reported by Shivaprasad will still exist...
--
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team