On 19/05/2022 09.08, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 19/05/2022 08.39, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 18/05/2022 17.08, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
The "-display sdl" option still uses a hand-crafted parser for its parameters since we didn't want to drag an interface we considered somewhat flawed into the QAPI schema. Since the flaws are gone now, it's time to QAPIfy.
This introduces the new "DisplaySDL" QAPI struct that is used to hold the parameters that are unique to the SDL display. The only specific parameter is currently "grab-mod" that is used to specify the required modifier keys to escape from the mouse grabbing mode.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> --- qapi/ui.json | 27 +++++++++++++++- include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 2 -- softmmu/globals.c | 2 -- softmmu/vl.c | 70 +---------------------------------------- ui/sdl2.c | 10 ++++++ 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qapi/ui.json b/qapi/ui.json index 11a827d10f..a244e26e0f 100644 --- a/qapi/ui.json +++ b/qapi/ui.json @@ -1295,6 +1295,30 @@ '*swap-opt-cmd': 'bool' } } +## +# @GrabMod: +# +# Set of modifier keys that need to be hold for shortcut key actions. +# +# Since: 7.1 +## +{ 'enum' : 'GrabMod', + 'data' : [ 'lctrl-lalt', 'lshift-lctrl-lalt', 'rctrl' ] }
This is fine now. If we ever generalize to "arbitrary set of modifier keys", it'll become somewhat awkward. No objection from me.
Oh well, I just noticed that we already have a GrabToggleKeys enum in qapi/common.json ... I wonder whether I should try to use that instead? It seems to be used in a slightly different context, though, if I get that right ...? Thomas