On 19/05/2022 09.08, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 19/05/2022 08.39, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 18/05/2022 17.08, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> The "-display sdl" option still uses a hand-crafted parser for its
>>> parameters since we didn't want to drag an interface we considered
>>> somewhat flawed into the QAPI schema. Since the flaws are gone now,
>>> it's time to QAPIfy.
>>>
>>> This introduces the new "DisplaySDL" QAPI struct that is used to
hold
>>> the parameters that are unique to the SDL display. The only specific
>>> parameter is currently "grab-mod" that is used to specify the
required
>>> modifier keys to escape from the mouse grabbing mode.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> qapi/ui.json | 27 +++++++++++++++-
>>> include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 2 --
>>> softmmu/globals.c | 2 --
>>> softmmu/vl.c | 70 +----------------------------------------
>>> ui/sdl2.c | 10 ++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/qapi/ui.json b/qapi/ui.json
>>> index 11a827d10f..a244e26e0f 100644
>>> --- a/qapi/ui.json
>>> +++ b/qapi/ui.json
>>> @@ -1295,6 +1295,30 @@
>>> '*swap-opt-cmd': 'bool'
>>> } }
>>> +##
>>> +# @GrabMod:
>>> +#
>>> +# Set of modifier keys that need to be hold for shortcut key actions.
>>> +#
>>> +# Since: 7.1
>>> +##
>>> +{ 'enum' : 'GrabMod',
>>> + 'data' : [ 'lctrl-lalt', 'lshift-lctrl-lalt',
'rctrl' ] }
>>
>> This is fine now. If we ever generalize to "arbitrary set of modifier
>> keys", it'll become somewhat awkward. No objection from me.
Oh well, I just noticed that we already have a GrabToggleKeys enum in
qapi/common.json ... I wonder whether I should try to use that instead? It
seems to be used in a slightly different context, though, if I get that
right ...?
Thomas