On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 12:14 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> if (isLink) {
> VIR_DEBUG("Creating symlink %s -> %s", data->file,
data->target);
> +
> + /* First, unlink the symlink target. Symlinks change and
> + * therefore we have no guarantees that pre-existing
> + * symlink is still valid. */
> + if (unlink(data->file) < 0 &&
Here...
> + errno != ENOENT) {
> + virReportSystemError(errno,
> + _("Unable to remove symlink %s"),
> + data->file);
... and here, shouldn't you be using data->target instead
of data->file?
Never mind, you got it right and I clearly need more coffee :)
However, later on:
> + virReportSystemError(errno,
> + _("Unable to create symlink %s"),
> + data->target);
> + goto cleanup;
You should use data->file here to be consistent.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization