On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 12:55 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:50:11PM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > This wording really sounds docker-specific. The registry word only fits
> > docker terminology, would surely not apply to virt-builder or appc case.
> > Something like "images storage" would may be more generic. The
problem
> > is that "repository" has a special meaning in the docker
terminology.
>
> Yeah, I was thinking we might need some way to let source subclasses
> add custom arguments. eg so we'd have --docker-registry.
>
> The appc spec doesn't have a concept of a central registry in the
> same way as docker. Instead the image name encodes the domain
> name, eg
example.com/someapp, and there's a protocol to use
> this to identify the server, and then resolve the download URL
>
> > ACK, but may need some thinking on the "Registry" word.
>
> I'm inclined to merge this, and then fix it afterwards to be more
> generic
Sure... but then we surely don't want to get a release out with the
temporary parameter.
Oh definitely not. I'm not intending todo a release immediately. I want
some time to play around with this code and clean up more stuff before
we release it and get stuck with the syntax.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: