On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:03:12 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> A process can access a file if the set of MCS categories
> for the file is equal-to *or* a subset-of, the set of
> MCS categories for the process.
>
> If there are two VMs:
>
> a) svirt_t:s0:c117
> b) svirt_t:s0:c117,c720
>
> Then VM (b) is able to access files labelled for VM (a).
>
> IOW, we must discard case where the categories are equal
> because that is a subset of many other valid category pairs.
>
> Fixes:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/153
> CVE-2021-xxxx - tbd before pushing
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/security/security_selinux.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/security/security_selinux.c b/src/security/security_selinux.c
> index b50f4463cc..c98dab0d6f 100644
> --- a/src/security/security_selinux.c
> +++ b/src/security/security_selinux.c
> @@ -383,7 +383,15 @@ virSecuritySELinuxMCSFind(virSecurityManager *mgr,
> VIR_DEBUG("Try cat %s:c%d,c%d", sens, c1 + catMin, c2 + catMin);
>
> if (c1 == c2) {
> - mcs = g_strdup_printf("%s:c%d", sens, catMin + c1);
> + /*
> + * A process can access a file if the set of MCS categories
> + * for the file is equal-to *or* a subset-of, the set of
> + * MCS categories for the process.
> + *
> + * IOW, we must discard case where the categories are equal
> + * because that is a subset of other category pairs.
> + */
> + continue
Missing ';'
> } else {
> if (c1 > c2) {
> int t = c1;
This algorithm seems to be susceptible to infinite loops in case when
'catMin' and 'catMax' are too close or there's already enough of
them
taken. Not a problem with this patch per-se, but it makes it more
likely.
Categories must be ordered, and we can't use matching categories, so
with the range 0->1023, we have something like (1024*1024/2)-1024
total unique pairs. aka 523264.
I'll be impressed if someone has enough VMs on a single host to use
more than 1% of that total space.
So you're right that its tehcnically an inifinite loop but in practice
we can ignore the problem (for now).
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: