Thanks Daniel,
Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a more complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux hypervisor support. Why is this more complex? Could you please explain a bit more?
By the way, with libvirt, can I control a hypervisor without the libvirtd running with root privilege (or even without libvirtd running at all?)? Thanks. -Yushu On 9/5/08 11:27 AM, "Daniel Veillard" <veillard@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:19:47AM -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
Hi All,
Just wondering has anyone successfully ported libvirt to Mac yet?
If yes, could you give some instructions. If not, is there any plans?
Well there is porting, which means just being able to compile it without any hypervisor support allowing to do remote access (like for the current Windows port) and that should not be too hard on MacOS-X due to its UNIX lineage. Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a more complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux hypervisor support.
In any case, portability patches are welcome !
Daniel