21 May
2013
21 May
'13
5:24 a.m.
On 21 May 2013 10:02, Li Zhang <zhlcindy@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2013年05月21日 16:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 21 May 2013 09:39, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
Libvirt has always had support for specifying what machine type to use.
OK, that makes sense. So is the problem here just configuration or is it the next layer above libvirt not being configurable?
Currently, the next layer above libvirt is not configurable. It is dependent on this default setting. Users also expect to start one VM successfully by default.
Right. I think we've now identified the bit of software whose x86-centric assumptions need fixing :-) thanks -- PMM