Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> It will not be possible to detach such device later. Also improve
> logging in such cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek(a)invisiblethingslab.com>
> ---
> src/libxl/libxl_driver.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
> index ce3a99b..005cc96 100644
> --- a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
> +++ b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
> @@ -2787,6 +2787,7 @@ libxlDomainAttachNetDevice(libxlDriverPrivatePtr driver,
> int actualType;
> libxl_device_nic nic;
> int ret = -1;
> + char mac[VIR_MAC_STRING_BUFLEN];
>
> /* preallocate new slot for device */
> if (VIR_REALLOC_N(vm->def->nets, vm->def->nnets + 1) < 0)
> @@ -2801,6 +2802,14 @@ libxlDomainAttachNetDevice(libxlDriverPrivatePtr driver,
>
> actualType = virDomainNetGetActualType(net);
>
> + /* -2 means "multiple matches" so then fail also */
>
No longer true after commit 2fbae1b2. I think you just want to check if
virDomainNetFindIdx() >= 0, meaning the def already contains a net
device with the same mac address.
But here the error is when the device *is* found, so the opposite case
than already reported as an error by virDomainNetFindIdx. Is it correct
(harmless) to call virReportError when no error occurred (function
returns >=0)? Maybe libvirt should check for duplicated devices at
higher level (-> for all drivers in the same place)?
> + if (virDomainNetFindIdx(vm->def, net) != -1) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
> + _("device matching mac address %s already exists"),
> + virMacAddrFormat(&net->mac, mac));
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> if (actualType == VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_HOSTDEV) {
> /* This is really a "smart hostdev", so it should be attached
> * as a hostdev (the hostdev code will reach over into the
> @@ -2879,6 +2888,7 @@ libxlDomainAttachDeviceConfig(virDomainDefPtr vmdef,
virDomainDeviceDefPtr dev)
> virDomainHostdevDefPtr hostdev;
> virDomainHostdevDefPtr found;
> virDomainHostdevSubsysPCIPtr pcisrc;
> + char mac[VIR_MAC_STRING_BUFLEN];
>
> switch (dev->type) {
> case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_DISK:
> @@ -2896,6 +2906,12 @@ libxlDomainAttachDeviceConfig(virDomainDefPtr vmdef,
virDomainDeviceDefPtr dev)
>
> case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NET:
> net =
dev->data.net;
> + if (virDomainNetFindIdx(vmdef, net) >= 0) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG,
> + _("network device with mac %s already
exists."),
> + virMacAddrFormat(&net->mac, mac));
> + return -1;
> + }
>
Ah, like you've done here :-).
> if (virDomainNetInsert(vmdef, net))
> return -1;
>
dev->data.net = NULL;
> @@ -3060,8 +3076,18 @@ libxlDomainDetachNetDevice(libxlDriverPrivatePtr driver,
> char mac[VIR_MAC_STRING_BUFLEN];
> int ret = -1;
>
> - if ((detachidx = virDomainNetFindIdx(vm->def, net)) < 0)
> + if ((detachidx = virDomainNetFindIdx(vm->def, net)) < 0) {
> + if (detachidx == -2) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
> + _("multiple devices matching mac address %s found"),
> + virMacAddrFormat(&net->mac, mac));
> + } else {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
> + _("network device %s not found"),
> + virMacAddrFormat(&net->mac, mac));
> + }
>
virDomainNetFindIdx() handles the error reporting now.
> return -1;
> + }
>
> detach = vm->def->nets[detachidx];
>
> @@ -3136,6 +3162,7 @@ libxlDomainDetachDeviceConfig(virDomainDefPtr vmdef,
virDomainDeviceDefPtr dev)
> virDomainHostdevDefPtr hostdev, det_hostdev;
> virDomainNetDefPtr net;
> int idx;
> + char mac[VIR_MAC_STRING_BUFLEN];
>
> switch (dev->type) {
> case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_DISK:
> @@ -3150,8 +3177,18 @@ libxlDomainDetachDeviceConfig(virDomainDefPtr vmdef,
virDomainDeviceDefPtr dev)
>
> case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NET:
> net =
dev->data.net;
> - if ((idx = virDomainNetFindIdx(vmdef, net)) < 0)
> + if ((idx = virDomainNetFindIdx(vmdef, net)) < 0) {
> + if (idx == -2) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
> + _("multiple devices matching mac address %s
found"),
> + virMacAddrFormat(&dev->data.net->mac, mac));
> + } else {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED,
> + _("network device %s not found"),
> + virMacAddrFormat(&dev->data.net->mac, mac));
> + }
>
Same here.
Regards,
Jim
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?