"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:29:14PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> ...
> > No, they are all correct AFAIK. The *existing* code was buggy using
> > the wrong macros in many places.
> ...
> > You need to compare with the function context shown in the patch, rather
> > than assume the original code was correct :-)
>
> Yeah, "assuming" can cause trouble ;-)
>
> It would help others down the road if there were a note
> in the ChangeLog that this change set also fixes several bugs.
I comitted this in two parts, the first doing the bug fix.
Thanks!
FYI, I've rebased the git tree.