On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 08:05:39PM +0100, Paul Jenner wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:51 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Paul Jenner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 13:14 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > %if %{with_python}
> > > %package python
> > > Summary: Python bindings for the libvirt library
> > > Group: Development/Libraries
> > > Requires: libvirt = %{version}-%{release}
> >
> > Do the python bindings really depend on the libvirt (daemon) package or
> > just libvirt-client libraries?
> >
> > At the moment, I don't think I can install virt-manager on a management
> > client machine without also installing the libvirt daemon due to this
> > dependency - which feels wrong.
>
> Yeah that's bogus, we forgot to change the dep to libvirt-client
So is the attached an acceptable patch (although I have not tested it)?
It would be nice if virt-manager could be installed on F12 without
requiring libvirt daemon and dependencies.
Yep, I've commited this patch.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|