Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 00/13] Yet another c99 struct initialization conversion

I wonder if there's any syntax-check rule that we could use to enforce this style. Michal Privoznik (13): virsh: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdDef virsh.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-domain-monitor.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-domain.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-host.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-interface.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-network.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-nodedev.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-nwfilter.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-pool.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-secret.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-snapshot.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo virsh-volume.c: Switch to c99 initialization of vshCmdInfo tools/virsh-domain-monitor.c | 198 ++++-- tools/virsh-domain.c | 1409 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- tools/virsh-host.c | 222 +++++-- tools/virsh-interface.c | 256 +++++--- tools/virsh-network.c | 230 +++++-- tools/virsh-nodedev.c | 144 +++-- tools/virsh-nwfilter.c | 92 ++- tools/virsh-pool.c | 331 +++++++--- tools/virsh-secret.c | 109 +++- tools/virsh-snapshot.c | 182 ++++-- tools/virsh-volume.c | 276 +++++++-- tools/virsh.c | 97 ++- 12 files changed, 2631 insertions(+), 915 deletions(-)