On 11.07.2012 15:10, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/11/2012 07:09 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/11/2012 01:12 AM, Hendrik Schwartke wrote:
+ atime->tv_sec = sb.st_atime; + mtime->tv_sec = sb.st_mtime; + catime->tv_sec = sb.st_ctime; +#if _BSD_SOURCE || _SVID_SOURCE + atime->tv_nsec = sb.st_atim.tv_nsec; Yuck. I've nearly got consensus to use the gnulib stat-time module, in which case this would instead be the much simpler: Ok, that sounds good. But what exactly does 'nearly' mean? It means 3 of the 4 copyright holders have agreed, with less than 24-hour turnaround time; the 4th will likely respond sometime this week: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-07/msg00141.html
Correction - there is only one copyright holder - the FSF. But 3 of the 4 original contributors have agreed to a relicense, and if all original contributors agree, then we don't have to bother the FSF with a much more formal and lengthy process of convincing the FSF to relicense.
Oh, cool. I didn't thought that this could be done in such a short term. So I will update my patch using stat-time this week so that it is ready if the license has changed. (I will also add the birth time.) Thanks Hendrik