On 09/24/2015 03:45 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:18:33PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> This seemed to be more of a false positive as for some reason Coverity
> was missing the "ret < 0" goto error condition and somehow believing
that
> event could be overwritten. At first I thought it was just the ret != 0
> condition difference, but it wasn't.
>
Then those changes are cosmetic and don't need to be in a commit fixing
the RESOURCE_LEAK.
OK - I've split this patch in two - cosmetic and resource_leak and
pushed the patches that have been ACK'd... I'll continue to plug through
issues noted from patch 1 along with the ones referenced in my cover letter.
Tks -
John